S2 Ep. 123 The Abilene Paradox

Can two walk together unless they are agreed? Amos 3:3
 
 
To have an agreement in carrying out any particular decision at all points to an underlying understanding that the parties involved in making that decision(s) have displayed based on the available information. 

The management of agreement is crucial in the survival and existence of any organization, be it formal or informal. It defines the sustainability and longevity of that union.
In this episode of the Word café, I will be looking at a subject that opens up a lot on the subject of management of agreement. It is called the Abilene Paradox.

The Abilene Paradox is a phenomenon where a group of people collectively agree to pursue a course of action, even though it contradicts the preferences or desires of the individuals in the group. The term was coined by management expert Jerry B. Harvey in 1974, based on a personal experience he had with his family on a trip to Abilene, Texas.
In the Abilene Paradox, group members often go along with a proposed plan of action or decision, even if they disagree with it because they assume that everyone else in the group wants to do it. They may also fear speaking out or disagreeing with the group because they don't want to cause conflict or offend others.

The paradox is often associated with group decision-making, where members may be more concerned with maintaining social harmony and avoiding conflict than with making the best possible decision. The Abilene Paradox can lead to poor decision-making and outcomes and frustration and resentment among group members.

To avoid the Abilene Paradox, it is essential for group members to communicate openly and honestly about their preferences and concerns and to encourage dissenting opinions and feedback. Leaders should also be aware of the phenomenon and actively work to foster a culture of open communication and constructive conflict resolution within their teams.

Happy Listening